Burnley Grammar School

Alan - in fact that was the first time I have ever posted a link to anything on this or any other site - it has taken a while to work out how to include a link. Still - you wouldn't want to let the truth stop you attacking another contributor!

I went to boarding school from aged 9 on, as my father works overseas - it was just as it was.

By the standards of the 1960's, it was "normal" in terms of discipline - yes boys got caned, but usually it was the slipper/plimsolls, or a punishment gym type session. Especially once you got to 13 or beyond, a caning was designed to hurt and leave clear marks for other boys to see (in showers/dorms) for several days after.

All boys did a morning run, all year around. At 9/10 it was a couple of laps of the playing fields (so 10 mins or less), and it moved upwards each year, so that by 13/14 you did a "proper" 3 or 4 mile run. Every boy had to strip to the waist, no matter how cold it was. We did indoor pe in only shorts, but that was common I think.

There was no regime of set times for the run, or boys being punished for being last, but you were expected to "do your best/not be slow/lazy", and cold showers or repeat runs were used. I also recall a boy being caned for wearing a rugby shirt one freezing morning - but that was more for stupidity really, as he kind of stood out with dozens of other skinny bare chested boys ! We had to wear "normal" pj's for bed, and looking back that made no sense, as inside it was top & bottom of your pj's, and outside it was thin shorts only.

Comment by: Bernard on 21st July 2024 at 21:08


We can always rely on you, Bernard, to trawl the internet looking for pictures of that sort.

Alan - I knew I could rely on you for a negative comment! I linked the word "ideal" to the term "boy's gym kit" not academic subjects.
It can get very warm and humid in Hong Kong and there would not have been such luxuries as air conditioning in those days. My take on the clips would be that the school was taking its duty of care seriously. Boys who are comfortable are better able to concentrate on their studies.

Bernard 17th July 2102

Can't quite see what Hong Kong 55 years ago (minimum) has to do with British schools. Nothing "ideal" about that mode of dress for academic subjects - except to a very strange minority.

Bernard, it is school holiday time so I think everyone is away.

Discovering an old pair of PE shorts in amongst those that I wear during warm weather, memories of the summer holiday in 1962 came back - the transition from primary to secondary in a Scottish grammar school.

Our class teacher during that year was given to warning us what to expect in secondary – a separate teacher for each subject (about a dozen in all) against four in primary (class teacher, drama, music and last, but not least, PE). The primary teachers had time to get to know us whereas the secondary teachers did not, so would quickly resort to punishment rather than persuasion. Just to emphasise this, he would often “just happen to bump into” his former pupils who seemed always to have been on the receiving end of six of the best, or a thousand lines. Sometimes whole classes were punished. Fortunately, his warnings turned out to be exaggerated.

Our PE teacher took the same approach. Primary PE was already quite hard and the teachers were noticeably stricter, being seen as a link to the military. As our bodies were growing, he said, we would have to work a lot harder. Also, there would be a more rigorous approach - “yes sir/no sir”, standing to attention and not slouching around, military style marching. And in the final PE period of the year, he dropped the absolute bombshell - “Next year, you're going to strip naked at the end of the period and take a shower”. Horror of horrors!

You can guess what the conversation came back to over the summer. Unlike the class teacher, the PE teacher's warnings were an understatement. Our class was assigned the new PE teacher – a young ex-Army PTI with “old fashioned methods”. A new broom to sweep clean.

The first few periods were OK and he even seemed sympathetic to our shyness about showers. Soon we had to queue naked and wait until we were told to shower. Even for showers after swimming where we initially were allowed to wear trunks. After a while, he trusted us well enough not to supervise us, although he seemed to have X-ray eyes to alert him to any boy not showering.

If you forgot your PE kit, you did it in your underpants. Forget your trunks and you went in naked. Not all the teachers did this. One day when we shared the pool with another class, I found myself naked with stinging hands whereas a boy in the other class had PE shorts on (not that they covered anything when wet).

Steve – we only did cross country once a week, but punishment runs were frequently awarded. In primary we always wore singlets outside, but secondary PE kit was shorts and gymshoes – nothing else. We quite liked it for athletics, but not for cross country or outside PE in winter.

Steve - I was at boarding school for my 6th form years in the early sixties. We didn't have early morning runs, just Rugby/Cricket as seasonally appropriate on Wednesday and Saturday afternoons. Quite often in the winter months the Rugby pitches would be waterlogged, and then we got cross-country or road runs instead. Dress code was always plimsolls, shorts and mandatory top. Bare-skin topless definitely taboo, both out-of-doors and in the gym, but universally acceptable in the dormitories.

Does anyone have any memories of boarding school in the 60's and having to do an early morning run ever day ?

At my school we had a run 6 days/week, all weathers, distance depended on age. Shorts and plimsolls only naturally, so shirtless

Things seem to be rather quiet here at the moment. Here are some short clips which might be of interest. Going back to the 60s they show what might be called an ideal boy's gym kit being worn at other times during the school day.
https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/search/2/film?phrase=60s%20sea%20school%20hong%20kong

Michael, the great thing about English Country Dancing is that you only have to be able to count up to eight

Back in the late 1950s and early 1960s, and possibly in an effort to preserve our traditional culture, there was an option to teach Country Dancing. This was a regular fixture on my primary school's timetable, and my class became quite adept at each dance's individual choreography. The jaunty music was new to all of us and, with the rapid, almost breathless activity, added up to a welcome change from our usual sedentary routine. Sadly, Country Dancing proved to be a short-lived 'fad' and was all too soon displaced by another topic in the ever-evolving curriculum.

Alan and Chris G, thank you for your interesting recollections. I must admit never hearing of Honneger's "Pacific 231" previously, but will seek it out.

I was not a musical child, but various pieces of classical music were played immediately before our junior school assemblies and on one of these occasions I thrilled to hear a recording of the William Tell Overture. Perhaps I had not heard it before.

Chris G - If you enjoy train music, there is a similar piece by the Brazilian composer, Villa-Lobos called "
The Little Train of Caipira". I think it is almost contemporary with Pacific 231, and V-L wrote it as a break from composing his many Bachianas Brasileiras. There were 10 in all,
I think. At one time BB5 was greatly admired by big bands, and I played flugelhorn on it. But only once!

Pacific 231 has lonf been one of my favourite pieces, and although probably as monotonous as Bolero, somehow its less irritatingly monotonous.

The sunny weather here over the last few days has brought out a good crop of shirtless runners and cyclists, of both persuasions. Out of school hours, bare navels seem to be the adornment of choice of most young ladies - don't know why the boys don't have the same fashion opportunity

At junior school, in our so-called "music lessons" where we were taught to play the triangle or tambourine, there was ONE cassette tape, and all it had on it was Ravel's Bolero coupled with Honneger's "Pacific 231", depicting a steam railway engine. I think Ravel was to encourage our triangling, the Honneger was an occasional "treat", if the teacher had had enough of Ravel, and the triangles and tambourines.

The opening theme to the original detective drama series Van Der Valk is said to bring back memories of bygone "music and movement" classe.

Perhaps this may raise a wry smile.

I never hear "Dance of the Sugar Plum Fairy", from the Nutcracker Suite by Tchaikovsky, without mentally transporting to my infant school PE in a high-windowed Victorian hall, dusty parquet flooring, skimpy shorts, goose-pimples and all. (This was relatively late: I left infant school in 1992).

May I ask visitors to this site: do other pieces of classical music, or other musical genres, evoke similar recollections?

Scoolteachers - 2024 vintage:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp6643jd8nwo

Comment by: Mickey on 7th June 2024 at 23:29


I think that is encouraging, Mickey and seems to confirm that things are changing for the better in the 21st century, and schools realise that not all lads are comfortable running round half naked. Presumably the lads from 2001 were going shirtless of their own volition.

It was a bit random but I asked three guys at work today whether they had done shirts and skins at school or been given bibs. Born in 1989, 1995, and 2001 all had bibs and didn't really seem to understand any other possibility. The one born in 2001 said they sometimes did it during break playing football.

For some reason the link to the National Service article from City A.M didn't work. Here it is again:

https://www.cityam.com/will-it-work-national-service/

Following last week's ridiculous National Service "pledge" by Sunak (almost as funny as Starmer versus Abbott later in the week, here is a very well written analysis of the idea:

Will it work? National service

Will it work? National service
Sam Fowles
Sunak's national service plan has dominated the first week of his election campaign, but, regardless of politics...



In "Question Time" transmitted on BBC 1 on 30th May, Damian Hinds, a government minister described it (approx 3'30") as "a good way to ,learn new skills":

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m001zqb1/question-time-2024-30052024

This begs the question - what is school for if not to "learn new skills"?. In the past lads left school at 15 or 16 and most were ready to take on jobs and did indeed, "learn new skills" - by the age of 18 - the age when both main parties prefer people to leave school today, - they were very competent workers.

If anybody gets to the age of 18 and still needs full time education (of a sort) there is something wrong with the system. At my school, rotten as it was, they did instil in you the need for good time-keeping (punishment if late was very good motivation), and nobody left unable to read, write or add up. That, I emphasize, was a poor school in every meaning of the word. As schools now have higher standards (so they tell me) then the excuse for N.S. is otiose.

Rather interesting that Mr Dando has not responded to the recent news, which rather leads one to a certain conclusion in that case.

I'd suggest a boycott for the time being to show solidarity to the recently departed PE teacher after somebody so stupid made that approach at his work.

Comment by: Mickey on 31st May 2024 at 16:06
But did you spot any outies Craig?
*grins* keeping my running vest very definitely on!



Yes actually I did on the Monday run this week. A quiet observation. We don't tend to pick out things about each other once we are bareskin for the runs. You can never be sure what complex someone might have if you say something to them about it. So you can whip your vest off now and give bareskin running a bit of a go. By the way, something I've never mentioned previously is that I've a small light red birthmark on my lower left side, the size of a couple of stamps. It does not bother me at all and nobody has ever mentioned it and I would never allow it to prevent me removing my top.

I think the reasons why some boys at school (and later men) are unhappy or less than keen about going bare chested are quite complex and not so straightforward. Mostly I think it's a psychological barrier more than the physical. I've seen some comments on here from men who say they had quite nice normal bodies at school when younger but still didn't want to be made to do PE barechested. It's all in the mind in the end. Mickey, your 'outie' belly button is no excuse, get that vest off now lad! (smiles)

I've just come back from a three mile run we did tonight locally with a group of five including me. Just a normal small group, short run. It was dull, it looked a bit fresh at first but really wasn't once we got going. Didn't really bump into anyone much. Saves getting a sweaty top to wash as well.

It would be really interesting to see what kind of take up bareskin running would have if offered properly as part of PE, even if that was just as part of an afer school running club or something, set aside from within the normal PE lesson. I think there are benefits to be had for people that choose to do it and it wouldn't hurt to offer this style of running, or cross country to those who wish to do so, such as appears to have been the case at the Dunstable school mentioned recently.

But did you spot any outies Craig?

*grins* keeping my running vest very definitely on!

Comment by: Neil on 30th May 2024 at 16:24
Comment by: Greg2 on 29th May 2024 at 23:32


...."No Alan, I don't believe you are responsible so don't worry yourself about that. I think the evidence only points in one direction."

I'd just like to say a genuine thank you to you, Neil, and others on here, who have accepted my word that I had nothing to do with the disgraceful letter sent to Nathan's school.

How much more civilised the discourse has become on the site since last year, when certain people (who mysteriously vanished when the I.D. system was introduced) were accusing me of being several people, including "Mr. Dando".

However much I disagree with somebody I would never take that disagreement out of the forum, and it is terrible that anyone would ever think of doing such a thing, and I am sure none of the regulars on here would, either.

Just one thought - I wonder if it was one of Nathan's former disgruntled pupils who wrote the letter?. The reason I say that is that there seemed to be no discernable postmark on the envelope, I think Nathan said, which suggests it might have been hand-delivered

Comment by: Greg2 on 29th May 2024 at 23:32

I'm quite disgusted at the person that contacted the school like that. I too was interested in his views and generally interesting attitude as someone still conducting a certain amount of PE in the way many of us remember ourselves.

The facts seem to speak for themselves. I just looked back to the place he pointed out and read that. It was clear that Mr Dando had singled Nathan's own school out and gone through the website which made it clear the school still does some PE in bare chests and that the school required a mandatory shower as part of PE. Mr Dando made some inflammatory comments about this, like he has done with other places. Now he has resurfaced on here after being dormant for quite some time and just at this moment we hear this development from Nathan himself. I don't blame him one bit for his decision if this is what happens when you try to be open with others in a discussion.

No Alan, I don't believe you are responsible so don't worry yourself about that. I think the evidence only points in one direction.

In fact, Mr D is all over the place today!

Has anybody noticed the latest on the Fulwood thread:

"Tell the believing men that they shall subdue their eyes (and not stare at the women), and to maintain their chastity. This is purer for them. God is fully Cognizant of everything they do."

And there's an even longer admonition to the 'believing women'

It was always particularly interesting to hear the views and comments from Nathan, a present day gym teacher. What a pity he has now felt the need to leave this group due to some deranged and selfish individual making anonymous contact with his school. Whoever did this has shown no regard whatsoever for how this might affect Nathan’s position in his school, and for this reason alone it is a disregarding and despicable act.

I really wouldn’t have thought you would do such a thing Alan, but a certain individual who has resurfaced at this very time does seem highly suspicious to me. It’s understandable why Nathan has made his decision and I wish him well.