Burnley Grammar School

George G,

Like you the PE kit rule was shorts ( no underpants allowed) and plimsolls. It didn’t do either of us any harm and I don’t see why the rule needed changing.

Ah, yes, cricket.

I was dreadful at it. I couldn't bat and I couldn't catch but I enjoyed being outside running about in summer. I did used to try, I wanted to be good at it. My older brother was captain of the school team and so it was expected that I would be good at it too but no matter how hard I tried, I never got any better.

At university, I decided I would like to try squash so found a mate to play with and got kitted out. I was hopeless at that too and kept breaking the racquets. As a poor student, I had to give up on that because I just couldn't afford to buy them at the rate I was breaking them.

Some time later I went to see my GP about something else and somehow we got talking about squash and I told him of my plight. He sent me to do some tests and I discovered that I have no hand/eye coordination which explained why I couldn't play either cricket or squash!

I still enjoyed running around the cricket pitch though but I was much better at athletics.

Chris G The fielding position of silly mid on was once explained to me it was so called because of it's proximity to the batsman. Even for cricket because it was "only a games lesson" we just wore our shorts and top no cricket whites, and I had no idea that there was such a thing as a cricket box that could be worn for protection and we were never told about them by our sports/P E teacher.

Chris. Like yourself I wasn't particularly good at cricket although I seemed to be able to frustrate bowlers without scoring many runs. When it came to bowling and fielding I was absolutely useless and so had a sense of dread when called upon to bowl to someone who was a very good batsman. My over consisted of a number of wides and anything he could reach was dispatched far and wide including a couple into the gardens of neighbouring houses. To his, and my surprise, my last ball was straight and he hammered it straight back at me. I can't remember all my thought processes in the split second it took bnut I realised I had to protect a tender part of my anatomy and managed to get my hand in the appropriate area where much to my surprise the ball stayed even though I was knocked flat by the force of the shot. As the batsman in question later went on to play for England and scored a double hundred in a test match, I have tried to claim that I must have been better than the bowlers he was facing on that occasion.

George - talking of cricket, While i tried to avoid it because i wasn't generally very good at it, much preferring tennis which I rather enjoyed, I have two lasting memories of my exploits on the cricket field. First, having been placed at silly-mid-on or something like that, no one was more surprised than I was when i reached out to catch a rather fast moving ball and actually found it in my hand. On a second occasion, when called up on to bowl, something e;se I was utterly hopeless at, I successfully bowled five wides in quick succession. This mustshave utterly confused the batsman because on my sixth ball, iI actually took the wicket.

I was at secondary school in 1961 to 66. As was a lot of schools it was single sex. With regards to the comments about P E and games, I cannot say that I actually hated P E no more than a lot of us would say we did not like maths or English.
Just as the school uniform was blazer shirt and tie black shoes(the normal I should think for most people) so for P E the "uniform" or kit was shorts(no pants to be worn) topless and plimsolls without socks. That was accepted by parents and scholars alike. For out door games we would wear a t shirt of some sort. I must say my preference for games was in the summer when we did cricket which like me you were not brilliant you would be put deep into the filed with very little to do except enjoy the sunshine.
As for the rest of schooldays, keep your head down follow the rules and all in all it was not too bad.

Matthew - there is and they do:
https://www.historyworld.co.uk/photo.php?page=2&sort=0&l1=Childhood&l2=Schools&id=1608

I take the point about innocent memories and hope others will get back to posting and discussing theirs.

I remember gym classes just like this and loved every minute of it. What we wore or didn't wear was secondary to the challenges that were put to us by the PE teachers who in the 1960s had all done national service and the head of PE had been an army PTI. These guys were demanding and required that we did no less than our best and more.

To a point I think we were being prepared for WW3 which fortunately never happened back then (take a deep breath about that today though) and as such fitness and strength were to be developed and worked at.

We had three PE sessions a week one of which was at lunch time and that was always cross country running. Then there was one of team games, usually rugby in season and cricket or softball in the summer. The third session was in the gym so gymnastics, circuit training and sometimes it was turned into a game like pirates which I loved.

Our kit for rugby was shorts, socks, boots and shirt, for cricket, whites and for everything else, just like the lads in the picture, white shorts and plimsolls. When changing we had to take off our underpants and go commando. After each class there were showers which were compulsory, communal and cold, possibly preparation for life in the military.

The PE teachers always encouraged us and worked with us, demonstrating and helping us to achieve - their kit was normally just black shorts and plimsolls so no shirts for them either so bare chests all round was normal - it was a boys school.

Discipline was strict, there might be a warning but breaking a laid down rule, forgetting kit or doing anything deemed dangerous or stupid led to a minimum of six very hard whacks with an ever ready large plimsoll which left you with a very red, very sore bottom lasting a couple of days. I don't think any of us escaped a few doses of that over the years but the approach from all the masters was consistent and fair. A repeat offender would sometimes get the cane, I got it once after forgetting my kit for two consecutive sessions and six over a pair of shorts from the spares box that were very thin made sure I never forgot my kit again.

Happy days - absolutely, I really enjoyed my time at school and PE was a great part of it.

The memories on here are, for the most part, credible and I think many of us can identify with them. I think we can all reccognise the contributions which are fictional. and they are best ignored.

However, one aspect of the site does bother me and that is the contribution of women. If such a site existed where women reminisced about their PE classes, wouldn't it be strange for men to show an interest and post comments?

I post here and read here for the innocent, almost all, happy memories not for the fantasies which I find quite sick, so I'll join with TimH, James and Andy and decline to respond to the post by Robert.

Like James, Andy & probably others I will continue to call out what seems to be bullying of people whose views you disagree with.

Also: I won't be answering your questions because it is in the realms of fantasy land rather than an innocent memory.

James on 26th February 2022 at 15:44

+1

Robert on 26th February 2022 at 09:42

Interesting question however I think some needed to call out the bad behaviour that has tainted this board for some time and no doubt will again. I think it should continue to be called out too so that anyone stopping by should see it's not what this place is about which is innocent memories, not fantasies about things that never happened.

On the same basis, I won't be answering your questions because it is in the realms of fantasy land rather than an innocent memory.

All this sniping doesn't make good reading guys. William, Tim, Andy, Andrea, Philip and rest can we get back to some more positive comments. How about if I ask a question to you all.

If you were the headteacher/owner of a fully independent private prep-school (let's say 9 to 12 year olds) what would your policy be for boys indoor PE. Dress, lesson content and hours per week. Ideally justify your decisions.

I should begin. I think I would emphesise practicality over modesty and encourage a more serious approach to PE and physical fitness. My preference would be for just shorts allowing tops only for those boys with a good reason such has birthmarks, obesity and the like. Barefeet are easily preferably for indoor work. For content I would begin with fitness training and calasthetics in the first term , move onto gymnastics in the second term after the boys have achieved some conditioning, and only move to team games like basketball and volleyball in the third term. I would schedule two, two hour lessons per week so PE makes a real difference to the boys attitude and actual phyisical fitness and also allow them to truly learn a team sport and become accomplished in it so they have the oppotunity to enjoy the satisfaction that brings.

I hope you will all take me up on this and I look forward to reading your replies.

Matt, Andrea, Philip, Tim, James and David - I too agree. We really don't need to be attacked over our memories and views.

DavidG, James, Philip, TimH, Matt, the voices of reason at last.

I'm sure the disturbed trolls will continue to post but we must just leave them alone and not react to their posts. I think people do that with Dando but Alan is a bit more devious, just don't react to him.

James I fully agree with your comments.

Philip, TimH, Matt and I'm sure the list will grow.

+1. I'm with you. This place is about innocent childhood memories for the majority who post here. Others need help.

I agree with Matt.

Philip, TimH and other like minded people,

I'm with you. Best not to feed Dando and Alan, the page trolls, everywhere has some and they are best ignored. They will jump up and down for a while seeking attention as children do. It's a pity earlier times have past, both should just have their bottoms caned for misbehaviour, repeated when necessary until it works and they get the message.

Tim H: I am not surprised you agree with Philip. You seem to be birds of a feather. If 1950 ever comes back, we will let you know.

Have a nice day.

Just to say that I agree with Philip's comment of 09.26 this morning.

Yes, there are fantasists on this board, and many of us have identified them.

I could say more ... better not ... don't feed the trolls ...

Alan on 23rd February 2022 at 12:03


More fantasy including you thinking you know what I think and hope for. I simply post about what I remember and experienced, you wish to twist everything. I swam naked at school too, it was no big deal but no doubt you would wish to make it one.

Seek some help. Please.

Philip: Thank you for your insulting post. FYI I do not post fantasy. Those things I say happened to me DID happen, but I suppose you would find some excuse for it in your strict disciplinarian mind - talking of your mind set you don't belong in the 21st century, your views accord more with the 1940s and 50s.

I take it you don't regard William's constant remarks about boys swimming naked as in any way dubious?. Can I suggest therefore that you ignore what I write if it bothers you so much.

You are hoping for a time that will never return, but please keep your holier-than-thou remarks to those who appreciate them. You could do with a few lessons in common courtesy

There are two people who post here and display a disturbing attitude.

One is addicted to search school uniform lists and decrying what is found there. That to me demonstrates a very sick mind set and an obsession with what children are or are not wearing. The posts are totally inappropriate.

The second is Alan, always posting fantasy and put down of people who are simply recalling their memories of earlier years and more innocent times before we had misguided things like 'stranger danger' and 'every adult is a potential abuser' instilled into the mindset of children who in reality are not at anything like the risk those initiatives claim they were but Alan would like that to be true and in his fantasies applied retrospectively to every innocent memory.

I think both the guilty parties should be seeking treatment for their addictions, not posting here.

Tim & Phillip: I only respond when somebody says something disturbing. William's gratuitous remarks about naked boys swimming does genuinely concern me. I didn't start those remarks, he did. He often does exhibit this rather unhealthy interest. If commenting on something many would consider indecent in 2022 is "trolling" than I am, but sadly this particular thread seems to have been taken over by fantasists who like to air matters of this sort.

Like Philip I have to raise my eyebrows at the irony of Alan's comment regarding trolls.

Alan on 22nd February 2022 at 06:49

Oh, the irony of your remark. If anyone is trolling....

William (in particular) and Shaw, with respect you both seem to be trolling as there have been very few posts on this thread of late. Naked schoolboys swimming might interest you. It disgusts me that teachers could be so blatant not that many years ago, and it is reassuring to know now that anyone who promoted it would quickly find themselves on the Sex Offenders Register , and however much you regret it the so-called "good old days" will never return because kids are far more savvy in 2022. Other than that, I have nothing to say.

Alan, another child sex slavery gang being uncovered is weekly news at this point, how would schoolboys swimming naked be of any significance in such environment?