Burnley Grammar School

Comment by: Amanda on 1st April 2024 at 15:46


"A high school academy that my sixteen year old son goes to currently has a trans man (a woman who is now identifying as a man) teaching boys PE on the staff and having complete access to the boys changing room to do so."


This is the sort of ludicrous situation we have now employers are going woke with a vengeance. Things get worse in Scotland from today (and no doubt later this year when we have a change of government) because they are painfully PC, and it might be deemed illegal to say that you find the situation distasteful.. If it were me, if your son is uncomfortable with the situation I would find him a better school to finish off his education. It doesn't say much for the headmaster and his board of govenors that they are prepared to connive with this tomfoolery..

Spring has sprung, and the SockPuppets seem to be emerging from Hibernation, not that they ever really went away, despite the introduction of IP address monitoring. I can get a new IP address just by visiting my local public library, sipping a coffee in Starbucks or Costa, spending time in a Hospital Waiting Room or re-booting my Router if I can't be bothered to go out.

Are we really expected to give much credence to multiple nested Comments on Comments?

Comment by: Alan on 1st April 2024 at 04:12
Comment by: Greg2 on 31st March 2024 at 21:46
"Comment by: Janet on 31st March 2024 at 04:11

A high school academy that my sixteen year old son goes to currently has a trans man (a woman who is now identifying as a man) teaching boys PE on the staff and having complete access to the boys changing room to do so. I am not going to mention the school because it might cause problems if I'm identified and nobody is supposed to be making a thing about it, but this person is still biologically female and sporting clear female characteristics such as breasts. This teacher commonly takes certain gym classes with shirtless boys apparently, my own son included. All I will say is this is in eastern Scotland in a high population area and a large school. What do you think of that then?

How long until trans women, men who identify as women, are allowed to teach girls and get access to their changing areas in school?

Comment by: Greg2 on 31st March 2024 at 21:46


"Comment by: Janet on 31st March 2024 at 04:11
Janet why have you felt it necessary and comfortable to make the announcement that you took boys of various ages for shirtless PE over all those years, in both mixed and single gendered classes, and that you had access to the boys showering at primary school ages. I would have really hated to have had to shower in front of my female primary school teacher when I was 11. Thinking back, she was far too familiar with me anyway when I was at that young age. It’s just typical that there’s total disregard for how boys might feel about this at that age, so the boys will quietly just put up with it, even though they don’t like it. But obviously there would be not a chance in hell that girls would have to put up with that had the genders been reversed".



It's all down to power again, Greg. Janet boasts she could do it because she had the power to inflict it. It clearly doesn't bother her now., nor at the time she held that power.

We had no women teachers but if I had of done, I would have played truant more often, if they were prowling round the locker and shower rooms.


Teachers really annoy me - when they are not boasting about their powers in loco parentis, they are forever whining about how hard done by they are. Their Dr. Roach, a leader of one of the teaching unions was on Radio 4 on Saturday, ahead of a conference speech, giving us all the old hard luck stories about how hard teachers find it to cope:

https://www.nasuwt.org.uk/article-listing/the-teaching-profession-is-in-crisis.html

As far as I am aware the profession has been "in crisis" for the past 40/50 years. I would suggest a crisis of their own making, due to many of their attitude problems. The poor things find it so hard to cope with only 10 weeks holiday a year, a generous salary and pension scheme. Some are even turning to the bottle (some of ours were doing that back in the 1980s - in that one respect they must have been ahead of their times!).

It begs the question how would the delicate flowers cope if they worked six days a week in a supermarket on minimum wage, or in a job that required a degree of physical strength. It also begs another question - if the job is so terrible, why do they stay in it?. If they don't like the job - there's the door.

Money and power are strong incentives.

You sound just like Alan there Greg, actually I had to do a double take at the name just incase! The thing with being at primary school is they were and still are overwhelmingly female by ratio to men are they not.

If you go right back to infants school we changed at our tables in the classroom together in front of the woman teacher, boys and girls beside each other down to our pants and knickers with each other. I don't think anyone cared much at that. There was no changing room other than the class room we were in or we could have gone to a room that divided up a pair of classes with a partition but that was never done. All in it together at that tender age. A proper changing room seemed quite posh to get to ourselves once up to primary school.

Greg2.

What Janet says about primary school is likely not as bad as it seems when written down. When I was at primary school we went swimming very rarely actually but when we did we went along to a nearby leisure centre and two ladies would take us there from school, one would be in charge of girls and the other the boys and keep eye on us in the changing area as we changed in and out of swim stuff and dried off afterwards. Well someone has to watch a group of ten year olds don't they. I remember we often faced the wall as we changed. I think this most happened at ages of 9 and 10, that's 1969-70 in my case. You are right though, it would not have happened in reverse would it, but saying that, I was not unduly bothered. Our teacher was discreet and in Janet's case I very much doubt she was staring into the boys shower like the men might have done but that's only an educated guess on my part. This also comes right back to that mindset that says boys don't do modesty I suppose, although we all know that's completely false in reality. I actually had a lot of private swimming tuition away from school with a close friend of the family and a small friendly learning group.

At secondary school I remember the men that took me constantly watching us closely as we showered and timing us with the stopwatch to make sure we had our two and a half minutes under the water and it quite often going rather cold on us. I would have been very unwilling to stand there showering if one of the ladies had been watching if I'd had to do that at primary school, but primary age is a very different dynamic to secondary in terms of personal development.

Comment by: Janet on 31st March 2024 at 04:11
Janet why have you felt it necessary and comfortable to make the announcement that you took boys of various ages for shirtless PE over all those years, in both mixed and single gendered classes, and that you had access to the boys showering at primary school ages. I would have really hated to have had to shower in front of my female primary school teacher when I was 11. Thinking back, she was far too familiar with me anyway when I was at that young age. It’s just typical that there’s total disregard for how boys might feel about this at that age, so the boys will quietly just put up with it, even though they don’t like it. But obviously there would be not a chance in hell that girls would have to put up with that had the genders been reversed.

Janet, don't mind my asking (I know this is an incidental question) in what part of the United Kingdom did you teach? I went to school in Essex and thought that perhaps rules vary between local authorities.

Nicholas J.

Just reread the 2nd point Janet made (I have reprinted it here as line 1) and the penultimate line, which I have repeated as well for you:

"2. PE teachers are well within their rights to tell a class they want it done in bare chests...."



"....I was a physical education teacher for 19 years in the 70s, 80s and 90s, covering 1976-95. In that time I took boys and girls primary and secondary classes each week in the school sports hall with boys only, as well as girls only, at secondary level and boys (11-15) were always asked under any teacher, either male or female like me to do so without a shirt inside the school sports hall in the secondary school I worked at from 1979 to 1987...."


You will note she said "told" in the first instance and "asked" in the latter. A typical piece of pusillanimous word juggling much loved by petty officialdom.

Comment by: Alan on 31st March 2024 at 10:59
Comment by: Janet on 31st March 2024 at 04:11
Don't try to sugar the pill, Janet. They were TOLD, by your own admission, not "asked".





You seem to be arguing with yourself here. Janet clearly used the word 'told' and not 'asked' so what are you picking her up about?

I'm sensing an enormous amount if anger within your comments and I don't understand it. I remember having quite big anxieties surrounding PE related issues at school, at first I was afraid, I was petrified, especially showers and being made to get naked, but worked my way through them quite effectively and quickly enough in the end. I was there 1978 to 1984 so covering Janet's own time. I'm at a loss to understand why someone many years later continues to hold this deep seated bitterness on something as simple as a teacher asking a class not to wear a top in a PE lesson though. I certainly didn't care much for doing so myself at school if I'm honest about it but I certainly don't hold any resentment towards anyone for telling me to do such things. See my earlier comment from 29th February about it. Obviously everyone is different and some deal with things a lot worse than others who have the had the same. Happy Easter.

Comment by: Janet on 31st March 2024 at 04:11

"....2. PE teachers are well within their rights to tell a class they want it done in bare chests."....



"...I was a physical education teacher for 19 years in the 70s, 80s and 90s, ... at secondary level and boys (11-15) were always asked under any teacher, either male or female like me to do so without a shirt inside the school sports hall in the secondary school I worked at from 1979 to 1987..."


Don't try to sugar the pill, Janet. They were TOLD, by your own admission, not "asked".

Honesty is the best policy

1. Bare chests in physical education classes are perfectly normal and okay.
2. PE teachers are well within their rights to tell a class they want it done in bare chests.
3. It's okay to feel a bit anxious but it doesn't mean you don't do something.
4. The more you do it the easier it gets, very quickly.


I was a physical education teacher for 19 years in the 70s, 80s and 90s, covering 1976-95. In that time I took boys and girls primary and secondary classes each week in the school sports hall with boys only, as well as girls only, at secondary level and boys (11-15) were always asked under any teacher, either male or female like me to do so without a shirt inside the school sports hall in the secondary school I worked at from 1979 to 1987.

Between 1976-79 I worked at a primary school and took boys PE, girls PE and mixed PE, once again boys (8-11) took much of the gym PE with a bare chest. In this school I also had access all areas when required. Both schools required showering after PE for everyone. Male teachers supervised boys at secondary, I was able to do so at primary. There were no complaints.

Protests were minimal on the subject of doing physical education classes in bare chests.

Comment by: Tony on 30th March 2024 at 21:23

"I was playing devil's advocate with my comment Alan, that's all."


OK, Tony - if you say so, only I bound to say it didn't read that way to me.

At least you didn't come out with quasi civil servant-ese about "safeguarding", which Tommy did - I was almost expecting other jargon like "best practice" which I always find especially otiose (does anybody advocate "worst practice"?) and of course when things do go wrong - as they invariably do - the classic "lessons will be learned". Except that they never are, because the same situations crop up with depressing regularity, especially in the area of child welfare. You only have to read national and local newspapers to see that every week.

Re Kieran on 29th March 2024 at 22:15

"I used to go for walks bare chested... There was definitely something fun, earthy and a bit daring about doing so that I liked, plus the feel of it generally." - apologies if going too far off-topic but what made you stop?

I've also been following Craig's comments about the bareskin running group and more recently Jamie Pearson's on the 28th. All sound very positive. Tempted to give it a go myself as I'm guessing there's also benefits to confidence and mental health as well as physical.

Comment by: Alan on 30th March 2024 at 15:33
The old "discipline" argument, eh, Tony?, trotted out as an excuse for bare-chested P.E.



I was playing devil's advocate with my comment Alan, that's all.

Comment by: Tommy on 30th March 2024 at 15:15
Dear me, some dispiriting posts from someone on here. Suggesting that gay people shouldn't be PE teachers, and then PE teachers should only be married or cohabiting men. Implying of course that single men have some suspicion about them.

"As someone who has worked professionally in safeguarding,,,,,, the remedy is robust safeguarding procedures ...."

Problem is it doesn't always work does it, Tommy? Never mind, let's all think nice left wing thoughts and everything will just magically be perfect.

Comment by: Tony on 30th March 2024 at 12:54


The old "discipline" argument, eh, Tony?, trotted out as an excuse for bare-chested P.E. Tell me, did that stop Teddy boys, skinheads, glue-sniffers of the past, or today's epidemic of knife crime, and the need for metal detector barriers in schools (certainly in London) to prevent children, some as young as 10 or 11 taking blades into school?. Uniforms as a cure for violence and delinquency?. I think not.

Of course it didn't - and hasn't. Perhaps treat children like individuals and not herd them together like prisoners, and treat them as such, and they might actually enjoy school rather than resent it - and that is the heart of the matter - kids resent the way they are treated so they hit out - usually at the wrong targets.

I get sick of all the talk of "discipline", because it just doesn't work like that anymore - if it ever did. You might cower them into submission at school (possibly), but just wait till the bell goes.

Dear me, some dispiriting posts from someone on here. Suggesting that gay people shouldn't be PE teachers, and then PE teachers should only be married or cohabiting men. Implying of course that single men have some suspicion about them.

As someone who has worked professionally in safeguarding as well as these views being repugnant stereotypes, they are also tosh. People to be concerned about come from all states of attachment, and the remedy is robust safeguarding procedures and not resorting to stereotyping from decades ago, that never worked anyway.

Comment by: Alan on 30th March 2024 at 05:27
"I totally agree with you, Kieran, and have been saying this for years."


Maybe if you were as persistent with your PE teachers at school as you are on this website over the issues you dislike you might have managed to bore them into submission and got your way.

Logic says that it should make no difference if someone is wearing a red shirt, someone else is in a blue vest and another is in a bare chest, but I think getting everyone just the same, such as in the picture depicting this forum here, is that it promotes a disciplined and well managed approach where nobody stands out as better or worse than the others and is simply a case of a level playing field, literally as far as school attire is concerned. It was rarely any different in my school PE gym.

Comment by: Kieran on 29th March 2024 at 22:15
In response to Craig and also Jamie.

"...When I saw the recent survey from Nathan Hind on here I just wondered why make such a fuss in the first place, as the easiest thing would surely be to let those who like doing PE in bare chests to do so if they want and those who don't like baring their chests just stick the school vest or tshirt on top and cover up, keeping everyone happy. Why does everyone in a PE lesson have to look the same as each other?"

I totally agree with you, Kieran, and have been saying this for years.

We are constantly told that this is the era of the individualist, yet the backwards education system in this tight little island continues to want to turn out a human conveyor belt of identical human beings. We are not identical, we are all individuals.

A few weeks ago somebody posted a piece of video from the early 1980s from an American school, some were STTW some had shirts, some had singlets, but there was no great variation in performance and the teacher seemed quite laid back about it,. Time Britain entered the 21st century, and catch up with that American school of over 40 years ago.

In response to Craig and also Jamie.

I used to go for walks bare chested. I used to leave my home, usually around 8:30-9 am weekends and walk for about 3 miles from my home. The total walk was about 60 minutes or so. Sometimes, I would walk down the middle of the street past my neighbours like it on a frosty morning. I would wear walking shoes so I could move fast. Many times I would do this in quite cold weather. It was great. I had a lady friend that was eccentric and a bit older than me and we would walk some days together. She knew I liked doing this. Sometimes, I would take the Tshirt incase I wanted it on along the way but mostly I never took anything with me to put on my chest. She would chuckle at me sometimes while we walked. I would sometimes drive to Starbucks when it opened at 5am wearing no tshirt and then go for a run like that before the working day if it was warm then sit outside and sip my moca shirtless. There was definitely something fun, earthy and a bit daring about doing so that I liked, plus the feel of it generally.

I think it helped with my own inherent shyness I suffered at school on the issue. I determined to overcome being weird about going bare chested. I was only early 20's when I was doing this in the late 90's long before this current bareskin craze got going. By the time I'd got to my early twenties I really regretted being so shy and awkward in school over things to do with PE like having to remove my shirt for the teacher and be a bare chested skin during PE.

I think there are a lot of shy and awkward teenagers in school out there and were in the past like me who a few years later ended up completely different to their school days once they were behind them.

When I saw the recent survey from Nathan Hind on here I just wondered why make such a fuss in the first place, as the easiest thing would surely be to let those who like doing PE in bare chests to do so if they want and those who don't like baring their chests just stick the school vest or tshirt on top and cover up, keeping everyone happy. Why does everyone in a PE lesson have to look the same as each other?

Comment by: Neil on 28th March 2024 at 23:41


Serious question, Neil: Do you think we should just forget about what these men did?. It was a long time ago - let's forget all about it. It couldn't happen now, - could it?

The sad fact is, it probably does happen now - it is just that many people affected by it do not speak up about it while it is happening out of embarrassment, or feeling they will be seen as weak or fear they won't be believed. There also seems to be a view that boys are fair game - there would be howls of outrage if male teachers did what they did to girls. There would certainly be harsher prison sentences meeted out.

We hear of Nicky Campbell and Earl Spencer because they are well known. It happened - and probably still happens to people we have never heard of.

Sweeping it under the carpet, or wishing it would go away is not an adequate answer.

As we have seen, even when some of these old monsters do get caught, the punishments - assuming there is one - are woefully inadequate for all the damage they have done. Pleading old age for something you did when you were not old and frail is the refuge of the coward and it is noticeable they do not even show contrition.

What is your answer, Neil?.

Alan, I plead with you to stop repeating the exact same argument on here on the abuse issue.

Why are you unable to let go of it?

Comment by: Jamie Pearson on 28th March 2024 at 17:27
I've been lurking reading this thread and reading your comments with great interest Craig for the past few months.

Your hugely impressive and positive sounding posts have inspired me to set up my own little bareskin group too with a pair of friends, so we have three in our group set up a couple of weeks ago and one of them has decided to look into doing a social media group maybe on facebook with it too, but I set up our little one on Whatsapp like you have done, with a view to doing some of this throughout the hopefully decent summer ahead.




I agree it's good to read some positive comment around the whole issue of physical exercise even with adults and how wonderful you feel inspired and inclined to give bare chested running a go considering your own admission of feeling nervous as a schoolboy at the prospect. In the end it's down to not being scared of your own self and body isn't it. It does nobody any good to be overly cossetted from such things in school in my opinion, you learn nothing about yourself and will never break free of fears if you are.

Comment by: Tanya on 27th March 2024
I don't agree with the title of the article, which is ridiculous - "Swimming In Gym Class Is A Terrible Idea. Let's Stop Forcing Kids To Do It".



I really did dislike the headline on the article here. Swimming in PE is not a terrible idea at all. It's a very good idea and the younger the better. I often wonder why I was eleven years old before I even got my first chance to go swimming in school. We should be getting taken to the pool to swim and learn within our first couple of years in school shouldn't we? There should not be 14 year olds in school going to the pool who still cannot swim at least a couple of lengths of breast stroke easily. I don't think anybody should be given a get out from going swimming at school.

Comment by: Craig on 26th March 2024 at 23:37
I've got another two men ask to join our bareskin running whatsapp group over the last weekend, taking our count to 32 now, and we are at 22 takers for our Easter Monday run next week as things stand tonight. Both our latest ones to join are quite young, just middle 20s.




I've been lurking reading this thread and reading your comments with great interest Craig for the past few months.

Your hugely impressive and positive sounding posts have inspired me to set up my own little bareskin group too with a pair of friends, so we have three in our group set up a couple of weeks ago and one of them has decided to look into doing a social media group maybe on facebook with it too, but I set up our little one on Whatsapp like you have done, with a view to doing some of this throughout the hopefully decent summer ahead. All three of us took our first run together last Sunday afternoon in a quiet area and found it to be quite an exhilarating experience. I'm 38, the others are 41 and 45 and have been 'normal' runners for a while already. Now we've done it once it has made me wonder why it took so long to discover this possibility.

I used to get a bit nervous in school when I had to take my shirt off sometimes for PE lessons like shirts v skins and waiting to discover which you would end up being, or the teacher just deciding all the class goes shirtless sometimes.

I live in Shepton Mallet in Somerset which has some great running opportunities locally to go running like this off the beaten track.

Comment by: Ethan on 28th March 2024 at 13:16


I am not Jewish myself, but I believe one of the tenets of Judaism is "an eye for an eye".

These three, now elderly men, in their heyday inflicted unimaginable physical and mental pain on boys as young as 10 to young men of 17, two of them ran away to South Africa to evade justice and are intent on fighting extradition to Scotland, by the courts of that country, and no doubt imagine and hope that death gets them before the law does. This to me, confirms their guilt. The one found guilty yesterday, might not have even been in court to hear the judges remarks, hiding behind the age old excuse of infirmity.

Remember Ernest Saunders, found guilty of criminal activities in the Guiness scandal in the 1990s?. He was sentenced to a modest term of imprisonment, but got away with it by claiming that he had Alzheimers Disease. A normally fatal and incurable illness, of which he was miraculously "cured" months after his conviction. He laughed in the courts face.

Saunders, spent a weekend in Ford open prison, but these three revolting teachers have never served a day behind bars, even though they should have done.

Given all the distress and pain they caused they should have served at least a few months inside to at least partly atone for their crimes, at least as a token punishment..

Mr Campbell himself, now 62, says he constantly recalls his days from 10 up to the age of 17, and it causes him great distress, to the point where he remembers being 10 and cries on front of his wife. We hear of his case because he is famous - what about all the lads who didn't become famous, and what might have happened to them?. We will never know.

That is why I say justice has not been done.

If we are too squeamish to put old men in prison for their wrongdoing, and people like Saunders are deemed "too rich and important" to languish in prison, perhaps the answer is to make sure they get a really good thrashing in front of the people they hurt. They enjoyed dishing it out, let's see how well they can take it, even in their dotage.

Comment by: Alan today.

I think some people do like jobs that give them self importance and an ability to show it off. I'm Jewish. Nothing showed this off better this week than the two Israeli's who survived 7th October and were heroes saving lives who on entering this country were met by an officious and antisemitic border force officer who accused them of having attitude while displaying bags of it himself and prejudice and then told them - we are the bosses here. Actually they are not the bosses, they are the servants, the public servants and they seemed to forget it.

But there's bad eggs in every profession who let the side down in a big way. I think the victims in the Campbell story are best placed to decide whether they accept the outcome in that case and if they do then that's all well and good, I don't think there is any need for those not affected to decide that it's not good enough on their behalf.

Comment by: Vaughan Williams on 27th March 2024 at 16:59
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-68679000

Thanks for publishing that VW - I saw it yesterday and was minded to do so myself, but as you might have seen, when I publish anything which suggests that not all teachers are the saints they like to pretend to be, som HW readers come down on me like a ton of bricks.

It is worth pointing out that this old wreck, "unfit to plead" (though he will probably get his telegram from the King in 11 years time) is one of three at Mr. Campbell's school, the other two (PE Masters as it goes) are in hiding in South Africa and have resisted every attempt to have them stand trial in Scotland. I think their motives for so doing are obvious.

The victims feel that "justice has been done". I am afraid I don't.

Like the redneck swimming coach, some people should just not be in the teaching profession. It is less a case they want to pass on their knowledge - such as it is, - but they want to dominate children (presumably because they haven't got the guts to do it to grown men). The selection process should be much stricter to weed out undesirables like this.